Survey » Result overview

Survey result overview

General Information

Last answers:
  • dsfdsf
  • asdas
  • RNQRs
  • USA
  • India
Last answers:
  • sdfds
  • asdas
  • qjPBSH
  • Detroit
  • Imphal
Last answers:
  • sdfs
  • asdsad
  • 5KzsG
  • City-wide
  • Langolsabi village
Last answers:
  • sdfsd
  • asdsad
  • BdInZM
  • Poor and low income people
  • Fishermen community of Loktak Lake, Bishnupur District, Manipur.
Label Value Count Percentage
Housing 1 54
59%
Land 2 36
39%
Entire neighbourhood 3 28
30%
Cultivated land 4 8
9%
Street markets and activities 5 12
13%

Description of case of forced evictions

Label Value Count Percentage
already taken place 1 21
23%
underway 2 24
26%
threatened 3 11
12%
Last answers:
  • sdfds
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • Over the last decade, poor and low income residents of Detroit, Michigan, USA have had their water rates increase over 120%. For customers who have been unable to keep up with the cost of water and sewage services, the bills were transferred by the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department ([DWSD], under the direction of the Mayor of Detroit,) to the homeowners' property taxes. The bills typically ranged from several hundred dollars to thousands of dollars, and made it more difficult for low income people to pay their property taxes. This resulted in at least 10,000 homes going into foreclosure and being confiscated by the government because of added water debt that people could not afford. In 2014, the practice of mass water shutoffs was escalated dramatically and nearly 3,000 homes had their water turned off each week. In fall 2014, the City of Detroit stopped the practice of placing unpaid water bills on property taxes because it was causing additional problems with abandoned homes and other housing market concerns. We continue to fight this battle against water shutoffs and home tax foreclosures on poor people. For specific housing evictions, there are three cases in 2016 that are emblematic of the Detroit housing crisis for low income and poor people: 1) In May, a single mother of four young children and a teenager who were forced to open their home for inspection by Children’s Protective Services (CPS) and the Detroit Police Department, and, subsequently, were told to report to the CPS office with the children. CPS declared the home unfit for children because of faulty electrical and plumbing systems. Fearful for the custody of her children, the mother sought help from MWRO. 2) In June, a single mother and her teenage son who were court-evicted from their home after her home was tax-foreclosed by a land contractor who failed to make agreed upon payments. The resident was a victim of predatory lending and real estate developers who failed to uphold their contract with her. The court bailiff and Detroit Police Department forced their way into her house and tossed her belongings into a dumpster despite community protests, including MWRO. 2) In July, a single mother with disabilities and her two young sons were told by their landlord they must leave the home they were placed in by an unscrupulous agency. The household water was turned off in January 2016 because of the owner’s failure to pay the bill, reportedly approximately $17,000. The mother’s health conditions prompted a social worker to report the home’s conditions to CPS who said the children and mother would be placed in separate foster care arrangements if they did not find another place to live. MWRO intervened to move the family and stave off CPS.
  • To, International Tribunal on Evictions Sub: Submission of petition/case story on forced eviction of local fishermen from Loktak Lake (Bishnupur District, Manipur, India). Submitted by Salam Rajesh/Journalist on behalf of the All Loktak Lake Areas Fishermen’s Union, Manipur, India. Background to the case story Manipur, with a land mass of 22,327 sq.km, falls within the Assam Hills Province of the North East India Bio-geographical Zone I. Strategically, Manipur lies at the crossroads of the Burmese, Chinese and Indian faunal and floral ranges. The ecosystem in Manipur consists of two interrelated biomes, wetlands and forests. The Loktak Lake, located towards the southern portion of the central Manipur valley, and its related wetlands constitute an important asset of Manipur’s natural heritage. The Loktak Lake, one of the largest freshwater lake in eastern India, with an area of around 289 sq.km., is rich in biological diversity and plays an important role in the ecological and economic security of the region. Loktak and its related wetlands constitute a habitat for a vast variety of biological life forms ranging from the smallest micro-plants to larger vertebrates including human kind. The lake was recognized as a Ramsar site of international importance in 1990. The lake is also recognized as an Important Bird Area (IBA) site considering the wide diversity of migratory and local resident avifauna and waterfowl population, some species arriving here for their winter rest from as far as Europe and China. In Loktak Lake, fishing is a traditional way of life for the local community. They have since become an integral process of the lake’s ecosystem, existing in sync with the natural processes of the lake. The fishery in Loktak Lake accounted for up to 60% of the total fish produce in Manipur State. Migratory fish species from the Chindwin-Irradawy river system in western Burma contributed about 40% of the capture fishery in the lake. With the commissioning of Ithai Barrage of the Loktak hydel project in 1983, there have been sharp decline in fish produce and in the traditional fishery. Migratory fishes have almost disappeared from the lake. The state fishery department had been trying to compensate the loss by introducing exotic fish species such as common carp and silver carp. More than one lakh people depend directly on the fish produce of Loktak for their livelihood and sustenance. The changes brought about by the Loktak hydel project had greatly disturbed the traditional lifestyle as well as in reducing the earning capability of the local fishermen. During the last three decades and more, the Loktak Lake and its ecosystem had degraded considerably as a direct consequence of the commissioning of the Ithai Barrage of the 105 MW Loktak Hydroelectric Power Project. The Loktak lake basin was not adequately surveyed in the planning of the Loktak Project. The data was mainly relied on the survey done by the Survey of India in the 1960s. This flaw led to severe impacts in the peripheral areas of the lake when the Ithai Barrage was commissioned. The construction of Ithai Barrage and resulting decrease in absorption capacity of the lake had impacted inundation of land in the peripheral, agricultural and settlement areas. Many interventions in the lake in the past decades including coffer-dam at Ithai village, dredging activities to de-silt the lake’s bed, removal of floating biomass, encroachments, etc. had also contributed largely to the degradation of the lake’s ecosystem. The Multipurpose Loktak Hydroelectric Power Project was initiated by the Ministry of Irrigation and Power, Government of India in 1971. The Project was executed by the National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) and was commissioned in 1983. It has an installed capacity to generate 105 MW of power by 3 units of 35 MW each, and to provide lift irrigation for 24,000 hectares of land. The Project involved the construction of the Ithai Barrage (10.7m high, with 5mx10m span water ways) downstream of the confluence of Manipur River and Khuga River. The barrage creates an impoundment and backflow of water into the Loktak Lake through the Khordak and the Ungamel channels. The cost-benefit analysis of the Project is given as follows: i) The Project had caused inundation of large tracts of cultivable land and human habitation, around 50,000 to 80,000 hectares in both the upstream and the downstream areas; ii) It had uprooted hundreds of local communities from their traditional sources of livelihood creating unemployment and deterioration in socio-economic conditions; iii) It had caused the disappearance of over 20 species of aquatic plants of economic and commercial importance; iv) It had caused the disappearance of several species of indigenous fishes that traditionally migrated from the Chindwin-Irrawady river system in western Burma upstream along the Manipur River for spawning in the Loktak Lake and other adjoining wetlands; v) Drastic changes in hydrological regimes of the Loktak Lake and the Manipur River, thereby affecting ecological processes and functions of the wetland and its associated rivers. When the Loktak hydel project was conceived there was no provision of resettling and rehabilitating the to-be-affected people living in the project area. More than four decades down the line, there are still indigenous people living in the peripheral shores of Loktak Lake fighting for their rights – the right to be fairly compensated by the Government for displacing them from their traditional lifestyle and depriving them of their means of livelihood and sustenance. Thereafter, in 2006, the Government of Manipur enacted The Manipur Loktak Lake (Protection) Act, 2006, a legislation which while aiming at the conservation of the Loktak Lake, had resulted in adverse impacts on the fishermen community thriving off the lake’s resources. The Case story Imposition of restrictions in Loktak Lake: The Manipur Loktak Lake (Protection) Act, 2006 was enacted by the Government of Manipur “to provide for administration, control, protection, improvement, conservation and development of the natural environment of the Loktak Lake and for matters connected with as incidental thereto”. According to Section 20 of the Act, certain activities in the ‘Core Zone’ area of the lake were restricted by law, such as (i) cultivation of athaphum; (ii) building huts on phumdi (floating biomass) inside the lake; and (iii) engaging in athaphum fishing in the lake. ‘Athaphum’ is the use of floating biomass to create fish culture ponds by the local fishermen to harvest fish. This is the more popular form of fishing culture in the Loktak Lake. The Core Zone incidentally covers most part of the lake water surface traditionally used by the local fishermen for harvesting fish and for other activities. Again, Section 31 of the Act which deals with ‘Right to fisheries’ define that the Authority may, with the approval of the State Government and notification in the Official gazette, declare any part of the Lake to be a fishery, and no right in any fishery so declared shall be deemed to have been acquired by any person or group of persons, either before or after the commencement of this Act, except as provided in the rules framed under this Act. Read with Section 20, the provisions in the Act outrightly restrict access to and use of the lake’s water resources for any form of activity, including fishing practices, inland transportation and use for domestic purposes. This, inadvertently impacts upon the lives of the local fishermen and their earning capability, thus reducing their livelihood options and sustenance. The Manipur Loktak Lake (Protection) Act, 2006 was enacted by the Government of Manipur in a hurried manner without prior consultations with different stakeholders including local fishermen community, lake area dwellers, independent scientists and environmental experts. The Act further empowered the State Government to re-constitute an executive body, the Loktak Development Authority (LDA) and to form a committee to look after the management and conservation of the lake, where understandably the committee is dominated by the presence of government officials with little or no participation of local stakeholders. The Act defines the traditional dwellers of the lake as ‘occupiers’, which is in clear contradiction to the Ramsar Convention’s Resolution VII(8) which gives room for recognition of stakeholders. The Act itself is in clear violation of the statutes given in the United Nations’ Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which recognizes indigenous communities who have been living in harmony with the lake for centuries as its guardians and beneficiaries, and are now being defined as encroachers. Families living on the 1147 inhabited floating huts on the Loktak Lake possess valid election cards issued by the Election Commission of India. They have a separate polling station during general elections called “Champu Khangpat”. With such existing legal rights, it is termed as irrational to accuse the indigenous people of Loktak as ‘encroachers’ or ‘occupiers’. It is argued that the Loktak Development Authority’s composition and functioning negates Resolution VIII(19) of the Ramsar Convention’s Guiding Principle for taking into account the cultural values of wetlands for effective management of sites which encourages cross-sectoral cooperation. The composition of the said committee gives no room for representation of the indigenous communities, and negates participatory policy making decisions. Action by the Authority: As a follow-up on the enactment of the Act of 2006, LDA officials along with a team of the Manipur Police entered into the lake area during mid November 2011 and from the 15th to the 25th of that month, the Authority launched an eviction drive wherein several huts built on the floating biomass phumdi were dismantled and burnt to ashes. Around 777 (seven hundred and seventy seven) phum-huts out of an approximate 1147 phum-huts inhabited by around 10,000 people within the lake were forcibly evicted by the Authority during this period. A mere Rs.40,000/- (around 590 USD) per family compensation was announced by the Government, whereas, this amount did not take into consideration the cost of the homesteads, cost of the fishing equipment destroyed during the eviction drive and cost for rehabilitation of the evicted families. Despite strong protests by the local fishermen families, the LDA went ahead with the eviction and 14 more phum-huts were destroyed in January 2012 without any prior notice. Between 8th March, 2012 to 29th March, 2013 the LDA had destroyed 56 phum-huts in contravention to a High Court’s order of 25th January, 2012 staying the eviction. On 16th February, 2013 a contempt notice was issued against the LDA for violating the court orders. However, another arbitrary effort at eviction by the Authority was attempted again on 29th March, 2013. Along with the dismantling and burning of the phum-huts, the LDA team took up the task of clearing a major portion of the indigenous fish culture ponds locally known as Athaphum upon which the local fishermen depended for fish harvest to earn for their livelihood and sustenance. In the absence of the athaphum fish culture ponds, the fishermen families’ earning capability had been considerably reduced, and several families have been forced to stop sending their children to school as they cannot meet their children’s school fees and other needs. The government’s action at forced eviction is a continuing process, and members of ALLAFUM have to constantly keep vigil against any surprised or unannounced move by the Authority to forcibly dismantle their phum-huts and restrict them from fishing practice inside Loktak Lake. Submitted by Salam Rajesh/Journalist (Email: salamrajesh@rediffmail.com, Mobile: 09612907292) on behalf of Oinam Rajen Singh Secretary, All Loktak Lake Areas Fishermen’s Union Langolsabi floating village, Bishnupur District - 795133 Manipur, India. Email: allafum@gmail.com Mobile: 07308010503
Last answers:
  • sdfsd
  • asdasd
  • fIpCkr
  • More than 200,000 residents have had their residential water shut turned off (approximately 1/3 of the city), and approximately 10% of these households have had their water bills placed on home property taxes. The number of homes that were foreclosed on because of a household’s inability to pay the property taxes in 2015 was approximately 28,000, affecting nearly 80,000 people. This year there are about 18,000 tax foreclosures that affect about 51,000 residents. It is not possible to determine a number of how many women and children are affected but we know that a majority of affected people are women and elders.
  • Approx. 10,000 people. Percentage of women and children around 65 percent.
Last answers:
  • sdfsd
  • sadasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • Water department and tax officials say water rates must increase (nearly double digit) every year because there is less water is being used, more infrastructure repairs are needed and overhead costs are constant. They publicly state that low income residents do not want to pay their water and tax bills and would rather pay for cable television service and gamble in casinos. Additionally, they blame homeless people who inhabit an abandoned house without authorization (i.e., squat) and label them deviants who choose not to pay rent or property taxes, and have no desire to work and be responsible. We know that local officials are desperate to collect water and property tax revenue because of consistent poor management, underlying privatization efforts and on-going austerity measures that have affected local and state governments. At the federal level, the cost of war and imperialism has meant local communities are suffering to meet the costs of public goods and services, while international corporations seek to seize municipal assets. Residents are unable to pay for the cost of public and private goods and services, including resources needed for basic human needs, because of capitalism’s devastation of local economies, the exportation of living wage jobs by corporations, and the destruction of the welfare state safety net. In addition, in Detroit we find more low income and poor renters who were told that water is included in their rental agreement are finding, unexpectedly, their water service disconnected because the landlord did not (or can not) pay the bill. Sometimes when a water bill is very high and a resident cannot afford to pay the bill, the family will leave the residence. However, who moves into the home next is responsible for paying the old water bill before new service will be provided. Officially, this is water department policy. Unofficially, the multitude of water and housing problems, along with unaffordable housing for low income people, are believed by many residents to be part of gentrification efforts to rid poor people from market-sought sections of the city; and to clear large sections of the city for new, green infrastructure zones that will reduce the new for vast infrastructure repair needs and costs. Many poor people cannot find and/or afford market-rate housing so many have moved into abandoned housing that is publicly owned by local authorities, including the City of Detroit, Detroit Land Bank, Michigan Land Bank and Wayne County Treasurer. Other long-time abandoned homes are owned by banks who have foreclosed and evicted people and have been unable to sell the homes to other people in this difficult economy. The Michigan State government has passed laws declaring unauthorized home inhabitants, occupiers, or “squatters” to be guilty of a felony if they are caught in a house without a rental agreement, regardless of how long a house has been abandoned. There are official and unofficial efforts to move homeless and poor people out of the city center and into parts of the city with less services and resources, as well as out of the city boundaries.
  • Imposition of The Manipur Loktak Lake (Protection) Act of 2006, and Government's objective of eviction of people from core area of Loktak Lake.
Last answers:
  • sdfsd
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • Pertaining to evictions from water debt on home property taxes, there are thousands of cases between the years of 2000-2014. The significant loss of home ownership due to property tax foreclosures over the past decade has affected approximately one-seventh of the population, or 150,000 people. The housing cases we submit took place this year in May, June and July, 2016.
  • First eviction by the Authority on November 11, 2011. Despite strong protests by the local fishermen families, the LDA went ahead with the eviction and 14 more phum-huts were destroyed in January 2012 without any prior notice. Between 8th March, 2012 to 29th March, 2013 the LDA had destroyed 56 phum-huts in contravention to a High Court’s order of 25th January, 2012 staying the eviction. On 16th February, 2013 a contempt notice was issued against the LDA for violating the court orders. However, another arbitrary effort at eviction by the Authority was attempted again on 29th March, 2013.
Last answers:
  • sdfdsf
  • asdasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • The damages vary and are economic, psychological and social and include: the loss of a home that is paid off or debt free; loss of payments believed to be going toward the purchase of a home through a land contract; a family home lost to unaffordable tax payments; lost wages and school time for children; physical and emotional family trauma and fear from forced evictions and threats of child custody removal from parents by child protective authorities; intimidation by and loss of privacy rights and protections from the local police department; lack of court justice and excessive force in court-executed home evictions; loss and damages to personal belongings from forced evictions; excessive and unanticipated costs associated with evictions, relocations and re-establishment of home essentials; community loss of neighbors, security and services and more.
  • Dismantling of floating huts and forceful eviction of fishermen families from their dwelling huts at Langolsabi flaoting village.
Last answers:
  • sdfdsf
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • Women and children are always disproportionately affected, especially people of color and the poor. Women are oftentimes fearful of local authorities and sometimes will separate their families by placing children with other family members or friends to prevent their children from being removed from the parent’s custody, especially when threatened by CPS representatives for having an unsuitable home for children. We also see more senior citizens or elders suffering the loss of their family home when they live on limited fixed incomes. These situations for poor women and children have become more frequent and dire for poor women and children. In 1996 the federal government placed five-year, lifetime time limits on public (cash) assistance benefits for families.
  • Women are rendered homeless and forced to stop their fishing activities which is their sole means of livelihood. Due to the evictions, earning capability of families had been considerably reduced and families are being forced to take out their children from school as they no longer can afford to pay for their school fees.
Last answers:
  • sdfsdf
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • The public authorities are the District Courts and Appellate Courts; the City of Detroit (especially the Mayor); the Detroit Land Bank Authority, the Michigan Land Bank and the Wayne County Treasurer’s Office; the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, and the Great Lakes Regional Water Authority. The private actors include Dan Gilbert, a who owned Quicken Loans and the Cleveland Cavaliers; Roger Penske, auto-racing mogul who owns Penske Corp.; and the Illich Family who own several professional sports teams, stadiums and the Little Caesar’s Pizza Corp.
  • The Government of Manipur represented by the Loktak Development Authority (LDA).

Support, measures taken and follow up

Label Value Count Percentage
no no 33
36%
yes: which? 51
55%
Last answers:
  • sdfs
  • asdasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • The measures have varied depending on the eviction issue and resolution needs of the family. For one family, they were living in an abandoned home that they inhabited (the city calls it “squatting”). The home has been in need of many repairs to make it safely habitable so the mother has been doing what she can to fix things (such as broken doors, windows, electrical and plumbing problems) while caring for four young children. Social workers reported suspicions about so CPS workers made multiple attempts to go inside the home. Each time the mother refused so on another attempt, a CPS worker brought with them Detroit Police Department officers who demanded to be allowed inside the home. She complied and they walked throughout her home open doors and cupboards and taking notes of everything they saw. At the end of the house examination, the CPS representative told the mother to meet her at the CPS office with the kids. A short time later, the mother called MWRO in fear her children were going to be taken from her. Instead, she came to the MWRO office which is located at a church in search of safety and sanctuary. MWRO spoke with the CPS worker and a supervisor who were concerned that the family did not arrive at their office as told. MWRO intervened and made special arrangements to place the family in transitional housing where they could stay for up to 90 days to receive support to keep the family together, and until other repairs could be made at the house they had occupied. In another situation, the family was working with housing activists to seek court intervention and to stage all-night vigils at the home. They called for supporters to arrive at the home each day by 5am, in case the Sherriff Bailiff (court-appointed evictor) arrived early to toss out the family’s belongings from inside the home. On the day that the bailiff was scheduled to arrive, many housing defenders were present and saw the dumpster container trucks coming down the street toward the home. We used our vehicles to block the street entrance so they could not park while others parked vehicles in front of the house. Violence ensued between protesters and the delivery drivers and one person fell and broke his leg in a scuffle. The Detroit Police Department arrived and issued parking citations to protesters vehicles that were blocking the trucks. The eviction was carried out by force and with police protection. At another home, the landlord gave the disabled tenant and her family notice to leave but they had nowhere to go and had no money. A social worker who was told by the disabled woman’s medical provider to visit and identify the household’s medical needs determined that she was required to report the parent to Children’s Protective Services (CPS) for not having running water in the home. CPS representatives visited the home and deemed it unsuitable for children. The mother was told she must move to another residence or she and the children would be removed from her custody and all would be placed in separate foster care homes. (Note: the government will pay someone else to care for your children under foster care but will not help you pay for expenses to care for your own children.) MWRO searched feverishly for weeks to find an affordable and handicapped accessible home that the family could move in to. A solution was found only days before the CPS deadline. The mother had to be lifted out of the second floor unit by several men and taken in a wheelchair-lift van to be transported to their new home. They had to leave behind most of their damaged and poor condition belongings so MWRO organized a community open house and invited people to take household items and used furniture to help the family start over. For thousands of homeowners who have lost or at threat of foreclosure on their home due to taxes, many have joined a lawsuit claiming the tax bills are inaccurate and larger than they should have been based upon regulations of the home’s value. Detroit has one of the highest number of property tax foreclosures of any American city since the 1930’s. Also, once foreclosed properties are vacated, they are often vandalized, burned down or stripped of all valuable materials, likes heating radiators, copper pipes, plumbing fixtures, electrical wires, window, doors and hardwood flooring so the house is no longer livable and then targeted by officials for demolition. This has repeated many thousands of times across Detroit causing some neighborhoods to be almost empty.
  • Public meetings and awareness campaigns among different stakeholders have been organized, besides organising boat rallies and protest meets.
Last answers:
  • sdfds
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • MWRO and other housing groups have had multiple meetings with local officials to help families stay in and get repairs made on abandoned homes; to get CPS support for family unity rather than family separation; to get banks and financial institutions to offer alternative solutions for families who have had trouble paying their mortgages and are evicted from their homes; and to push local tax assessors to provide alternatives to home foreclosures for people too poor to pay – or have been schemed in home loan fraud – instead of selling off their home to real estate profiteers. Affected persons have aligned with housing rights, water rights and anti-eviction groups to fight for legal protections, restitution and vindication. Plus, we have public protests and media campaigns to bring attention to the issues.
  • Resisted the Government's move by organising support of different civil society organisations and also registering a case with the Manipur High Court to stay the forceful evictions by the Government.
Last answers:
  • sdfdsf
  • asdsad
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • To claim compensation, housing groups and affected persons have challenged in court legal claims of mortgage payment default, false evictions, false affidavits, inaccurate tax assessments and more. Politically, housing groups have sought to change public policy and procedures that have not met due process or fair notice, especially when someone’s home is to be sold by the tax assessor’s office.
  • Compensation has not been claimed so far. The focus is on protecting the rights of the local fishermen community.
Label Value Count Percentage
no no 37
40%
yes: which? extra 55
60%
Last answers:
  • sdffs
  • asdasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • All of the solutions by local authorities are not real solutions. They include: a) Moving the families to homeless shelters. (The families do not want to go there as they’re not safe, people fear being there, they are only temporary and people are stigmatized.) b) Pay to move into another residence. (Poor people do not have the money it takes to move one’s belongings, nor the security deposit and first month rent costs, plus new utility set up charges.) c) Move in with family or friends (Oftentimes, low income families do not have other people who can afford or have the space to take in another family.) d) Enter into payment plans that now have interest charges reduced from 18% to 6%. (Out of desperation, many low income people have entered into agreements they know they can’t afford, especially at the original higher interest rate.)
  • None so far except offerong a paltry compensation amount of Rs.40000/- per family (around 590 USD).
Last answers:
  • sdfdsfs
  • asdasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • We have employed strategies and measures including legal representation for court eviction proceedings when banks have claimed a homeowner defaulted on a mortgage when, instead, many of those claims have been not circumstantiated. There is also a recent lawsuit by the ACLU and homeowners who claim their tax assessment is wrong and unjust. Additionally, we have protested many times at local authority offices to demand change and resolution of unjust and illegal practices. We have demanded that local authorities release publicly owned abandoned housing that is being protected for market-driven purposes instead of addressing low income, unaffordable housing and homeless crises. We are also participants in efforts for a renters’ day of action to bring attention to the problem of the lack of low income, affordable housing and market-driven goals that are leaving more and more people homeless, especially after Wall Street financial institutions have profited from a (inter)national housing crisis at their own creation.
  • The strategy at the moment is primarily organising people's support towards the protest move by the fishermen community. Media sensitization on the issue is also a focus of the strategy. The other strategy is to file writ petition in High Court to halt the eviction process, even if temporarily.
Last answers:
  • sdfdsf
  • asdasd
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • The court initiatives are on-going through Detroit Eviction Defense as they defend individual households from eviction. They represent approximately one family per month. MWRO’s defense of mothers with children, especially against CPS custody removal, is on-going with different families, when required. The Detroit renters’ day of action is scheduled for September 22, 2016. There will be future events building from this that are yet to be determined. We are also looking at a follow up visit by the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Housing to follow up on the United Nations’ 2014 visit to Detroit on its water and housing crises.
  • The process is a continuing strategy to constantly organize public meeting/hearing to keep alive the protest so that Government is kept at bay.

Details of the person registering information

Last answers:
  • sdfds
  • asdsad
  • wh2d6S
  • Sylvia Orduño
  • Salam Rajesh
Last answers:
  • sdfdsf
  • asdad
  • ywOgW
  • Organizer
  • Trustee
Last answers:
  • sdfsdf
  • asdsda
  • 8IikH
  • Michigan Welfare Rights Organization
  • Manipur Nature Society (Imphal, Manipur, India).
Last answers:
  • sdfsf
  • asdasd
  • WV2y1
  • 23 E. Adams St., Detroit, Michigan 48226
  • Sagolband Salam Leikai, Imphal West- 795001, Manipur, India.
Last answers:
  • sdfds
  • asdsad
  • tCLKLd
  • USA
  • India
Last answers:
  • sdfsd
  • asdasd
  • wNEJRW
  • 313-964-0618
  • 09612907292
Last answers:
  • sdfsdf
  • asdsad
  • l657F
  • info@mwro.org
  • salamrajesh@rediffmail.com
Last answers:
  • 6MtwTP
  • http://MWRO.org
  • Nil
  • https://www.facebook.com/FanTaiNanTieLuDeXiaHuaDongYi/
  • https://www.facebook.com/FanTaiNanTieLuDeXiaHuaDongYi/
Last answers:
  • sdfsf
  • asdsadsa
  • lZWfI
  • English
  • English
Last answers:
  • 45cwe3
  • Nil
  • Wang Tai-Ling
  • The same
  • 邱淑雯 0955-690-670、吳俊奇 0975-127-358

Documents (to upload)

Last answers:
  • qDqF0c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7ojQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com
  • I am trying to secure videos and permissions.
  • http://www.vita.tw/2016/05/blog-post_6.html?m=1 PICTURES http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160412/836915/ FILES http://news.pts.org.tw/article/320760
  • https://www.facebook.com/FanTaiNanTieLuDeXiaHuaDongYi/
  • https://www.facebook.com/FanTaiNanTieLuDeXiaHuaDongYi/
Last answers:

Publication Conditions

Label Value Count Percentage
si si 71
77%
no no 21
23%
Label Value Count Percentage
yes si 70
76%
no no 22
24%